Archives

You are currently viewing archive for July 2011

Tsleil-Waututh First Nations concerned about oil tankers in Vancouver

Jul 31, 2011


Tsleil-Waututh First Nations concerned about oil tankers in Vancouver, July 2011

We need to listen, and listen carefully - then join together to stop this potential catastrophe right on our doorstep!

Posted by activist under Environmental

Concern rising over oil tankers in Vancouver waters

Jul 31, 2011

Some oil tanker statistics (Port of Vancouver)

Port Metro Vancouver

Metric tonnes of crude oil exported via Westridge terminal

2000: 8,404
2001: 512,886
2002: 805,596
2003: 1,118,154
2004: 452,003
2005: 1,166,538
2006: 1,311,648
2007. 2,138,101
2008: 2,208,847
2009: 3,916,333


An oil tanker heads under the Second Narrows Bridge
An oil tanker heads under the Second Narrows Bridge. (CBC)


READ MORE AT: Concern rising over oil tankers in Vancouver waters (CBC NEWS)

Posted by activist under Environmental

Sign the No Tankers in BC Petition

Jul 31, 2011

I've just sent a petition demanding our leaders protect BC's coast from the threat of oil spills.

Please take a minute to do the same.

Visit: www.notankers.ca

Take action to protect BC's coast from oil spills - Protect Our Pacific Coast from Oil Spills

Please consider signing this petition to stop all expansion of oil supertanker traffic through B.C.'s coastal waters. Signatories also take the important step of recognizing the authority of the Coastal First Nations and Save the Fraser declarations, which are exercises of First Nations' law that ban oil pipelines and tankers to B.C.'s coast. The petition calls on the House of Commons and the B.C. Legislature to use whatever means are available to stop the expansion of oil supertanker traffic through B.C.'s coastal waters.

SIGN PETITION: http://dogwoodinitiative.org/notankers


First Nations Leaders Protest Tankers and Pipeline
Three Wet'suwet'en hereditary chiefs at a large gathering in Kitimat. Image: J. Paterson.

Posted by activist under Environmental

Interior First Nations declare ban

Jul 31, 2011

On December 2, 2010, 61 interior First Nations joined together to ban Enbridge's oil pipelines from transiting their traditional territories.

Click here to download a copy of the Save the Fraser Declaration.




61 First Nations have united in a historic alliance to protect the Fraser River watershed and declare their opposition to Enbridge's Northern Gateway pipeline proposal.

Dogwood's Eric Swanson gives an update from the event.

To learn more visit: http://dogwoodinitiative.org/

Posted by activist under Environmental

From Tar Sands to Tankers: The Battle to stop Enbridge

Jul 31, 2011


From Tar Sands to Tankers: The Battle to stop Enbridge

Posted by activist under Environmental

Letter to Liberal Members of Parliament

Jul 31, 2011

Dear All 77 Liberal Members of Parliament,

Most Canadians have a justified pride in claiming that we live in one of the most beautiful and pristine countries on this planet. British Columbia is home to some of the most sacred and beautiful terrain and waterways in the world. The notions of an oil spill, the tar sands development, the tanker traffic along our coast and in the port of Vancouver and the myriad of repercussions that potentially could impact on our environment, our economy, our people, and our future are staggering! I feel a strong responsibility to help to prevent this and urge YOU to consider your moral and ethical responsibility to prevent this. PLEASE!!!! Do the right thing...stand up to the pressure to provide oil to Asia and potentially doom your own people to suffering and misery. This must be stopped!

Sincerely,
June Kaminski

Add your voice to the PETITION AT:
http://dogwoodinitiative.org/notankers/actions/michael-ignatieff

No tankers!

Posted by activist under Environmental

From Tar Sands to Tankers: The Battle to stop Enbridge

Jul 31, 2011


From Tar Sands to Tankers: The Battle to stop Enbridge

Posted by activist under Environmental

Genetic engineering: The world's greatest scam?

Jul 31, 2011


Genetic engineering: The world's greatest scam?


Genetic engineering is a threat to food security, especially in a changing climate. The introduction of genetically manipulated organisms by choice or by accident grossly undermines sustainable agriculture and in so doing, severely limits the choice of food we can eat.

Once GE plants are released into the environment, they are out of control. If anything goes wrong - they are impossible to recall.

GE contamination threatens biodiversity respected as the global heritage of humankind, and one of our world's fundamental keys to survival.

LEARN MORE AT GREENPEACE CANADA

Posted by activist under Health

Enbridge Lashes Out Against National Geographic Cover Story on BC's Spirit Bear & Gitgaâ First Nation

Jul 31, 2011

Spirit Bear
The First Nation of Gitga’at, part of the Tsimshian people who inhabit the northwest coast of British Columbia, are stewards of the white black bear known as the Spirit Bear. They are all featured, along with Enbridge's proposed pipeline, on the August cover of National Geographic.



It’s a “white-knuckled fight” against the proposed Northern Gateway Pipeline from the Athabasca Oil Sands in Alberta, and the Gitga’at First Nation is determined to safeguard the mooksgm’ol, or Spirit Bear, and its rainforest habitat from the havoc wreaked by pipeline leaks and oil spills.

The August cover story of National Geographic profiles this white black bear, the Gitga’at and the struggle against Calgary-based Enbridge’s attempts to build a pipeline from the oil sands in Alberta to the Pacific coast, cutting right through the territory of dozens of First Nations. Such a pipeline would be Canada’s key to the international market beyond the U.S.—China is thirsting for fuel, for instance—but numerous First Nations coalitions have turned down financial incentives designed to get them to permit the transport of the extracted crude and gas across their lands.

Also at issue is the method of getting the oil ocean-bound: Under the plan, huge oil tankers, some as tall as an NYC skyscraper, would wend their way up winding, narrow waterways to Kitimat, which is coastal but not on the open sea, and load up on the viscous liquid.

A spill anywhere along the route, the Gitga’at and others point out, could have far-reaching repercussions on the environment and thus the people who depend on it.

Enbridge, steeped in p.r. problems stemming from a variety of noxious pipeline spills in both Canada and the U.S., on July 28 responded to National Geographic’s coverage with a statement of its own.

“Enbridge worked extensively with National Geographic staff prior to publication in an attempt to render balance to this article,” the company said. “Unfortunately, but not unexpectedly, very little of that information was actually included in the article.”

Taking issue with the headline “Pipeline Through Paradise,” Enbridge said, “it suggests the Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline would run through the Great Bear area. In fact, the proposed pipeline route would end at Kitimat, which is 32 km from the nearest protected area associated with the ‘Great Bear Rainforest.’ ”

In addition the company has “proposed a world-class marine safety plan, including double hulled ships, compulsory use of experienced, licensed B.C. pilots, and tethering to powerful escort tugs,” Enbridge said. Moreover it plans to help develop an “advanced system of shipping aids” to exceed Canada’s standards “and greatly improve safety for all shipping on B.C.’s north coast.”

At Guarding the Gifts, a charitable organization established by the Gitga’at First Nation in conjunction with the King Pacific Lodge resort, you can adopt a foot of the Great Bear Rainforest.

Here’s more about the Spirit Bear, known as the Kermode bear, at the Manataka American Indian Council.

SOURCE: http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2011/07/gitgaat-and-spirit-bear-grace-national-geographic%E2%80%99s-august-cover/

NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SITE AND ARTICLE: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2011/08/kermode-bear/barcott-text

Posted by activist under Environmental

Pipeline Through Paradise

Jul 31, 2011

20110731-oil-tanker-routes-990.jpg
Click on image for full view of map

Why oil sands, a sunken ferry, and the price of oil in China have the Great Bear Rainforest in an uproar.


By Bruce Barcott

Photograph by Paul Nicklen

Great Spirit Bear Forest

The Queen of the North was the pride of the BC Ferries fleet—right up until the night she sank. On March 22, 2006, during a routine run from Prince Rupert to Port Hardy, the ferry exited the narrow 45-mile Grenville Channel just past midnight. Then something went wrong. The officer at the helm, distracted by a conversation with another crew member, neglected to turn after leaving the channel, which points like a rifle barrel at the tip of Gil Island. At 12:20 a.m. the ferry's bow met the island's rock at a speed of 17.5 knots, ripping a hole in the hull. One hour and 20 minutes later, the Queen came to rest under 1,400 feet of water.

Of the 101 people aboard, 99 survived, thanks largely to the citizens of nearby Hartley Bay, who put to sea in fishing boats in the middle of the rainy, windy night to rescue them. Two passengers were never found. Today the Queen of the North remains where she sank. Every day, a little more fuel leaks out of her tanks, which still hold tens of thousands of gallons of diesel.

"We had to learn a new language," recalled Helen Clifton, a matriarch of the Gitga'at, one of the First Nations bands living along the coast. " 'Sheen,' 'shine,' 'burbling,' 'boom.' It opened our eyes to what happens in a disaster."

Now, when the Gitga'at people of Hartley Bay discuss the proposed Northern Gateway project, an oil pipeline that would turn these same waters into a supertanker expressway, they always mention the Queen. The accident taught them two lessons, they say. No matter how safe the ship, the most mundane human error can sink it. And when disaster strikes, they alone will be left to clean up the mess.

That leaves them skeptical about the pipeline and the tankers it would attract—about 220 a year. The government has already approved a fleet of liquefied natural gas tankers to call at nearby Kitimat in 2015. The oil tankers would be even bigger.

"I teach math at the school here," said Cameron Hill, a member of the Hartley Bay Band Council. "If I were to express the Queen of the North as an exponent, I'd say it was an x-squared disaster. The potential damage from those oil tankers is x to the 100th power."

With the Northern Gateway proposal, the Gitga'at and the rain forest that surrounds them have been caught up in a great geopolitical oil game. The Northern Gateway isn't just a pipeline. It's Canada's bid to become a global player in the petroleum market.

The proven reserves in Alberta's oil sands are second only to Saudi Arabia's oil fields, yet the United States today is virtually the sole export market for oil sands crude. A Canadian company, Enbridge, wants to build a $5.8 billion ($5.5 billion Canadian) pipeline to transport oil 731 miles, from Alberta to Kitimat. The double-barreled pipeline would carry oil west and send condensate, a liquid used to dilute the thick crude and allow it to flow, east to Alberta. Giant tankers—some nearly as long as the Empire State Building is tall, loaded with condensate or up to 2.15 million barrels of crude—would thread between a jigsaw of islands to and from Kitimat.

A West Coast oil port would open the Alberta oil sands to Asian markets, including China. Sinopec, China's state-owned oil company, is among the Asian refiners and Canadian oil firms that have invested $105 million into moving the Northern Gateway pipeline through the planning and permitting stage.

"We think it is hugely in Canada's national best interest to have a second outlet for our crude oil," Enbridge CEO Patrick Daniel has said.

The issue is no less critical for the Great Bear Rainforest, a wild stretch of western red cedar, hemlock, and spruce forest that runs 250 miles down British Columbia's coast. Whales, wolves, bears, and humans thrive in the rich marine channels and forests of the Great Bear, whose boundaries have never been precisely defined. "We don't want another Exxon Valdez on our shores," said Doug Neasloss, a Kitasoo/Xai'xais wildlife guide and marine planner.

Neasloss has hardly known a time when the rain forest wasn't a battleground. "When I was growing up here in the 1990s, there were almost no jobs," he said. "The unemployment rate in my hometown of Klemtu was closing in on 90 percent." Timber companies offered jobs. But wages from those jobs bought clear-cuts that reduced forests to stumps, destroying bear habitat and salmon spawning grounds.

In 1995 environmentalists began chaining themselves to trees and logging equipment to halt the cut. "Our community didn't welcome them at first," Neasloss recalled. "But then they all sat down and talked. Out of those discussions came the idea for the Great Bear Rainforest."

The battle continued for 15 years. By 2009 the province had put a third of the Great Bear off-limits to logging and the rest under ecosystem-based management. Areas are protected not only as parks but also as conservancies, where traditional activities can continue but industrial logging and development can't. A $126 million fund was set up to provide seed money for both conservation and economic development projects.

Just as the timber war wound down, the tanker war began.

Many of the same environmental groups involved in the timber fight are now opposing the oil pipeline, as are many of Canada's First Nations. "This is one of the biggest environmental threats we've ever seen," said Ian McAllister, co-founder of Pacific Wild, a wilderness protection organization that focuses on Canada's Pacific coast. "And it will become one of the biggest environmental battles Canada has ever witnessed. It's going to be a bare-knuckle fight."

The project is so big that the federal government has set up a joint review panel to oversee a two-year environmental assessment and permitting process, expected to conclude in late 2012.

The fight over the pipeline contains more than a few echoes of the battle over the trans-Alaska pipeline in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Back then, Alaska natives' land claims threatened to stop the project in its tracks. The issue was ultimately decided by the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, the largest land-claim settlement in U.S. history, which gave money and land to Alaska-native village and regional corporations and allowed the pipeline to be built.

So far no similar deal seems to be in the works. Last year 61 Canadian First Nations announced they would not allow the proposed pipeline to cross their traditional territory. Whether they have the legal authority to stop the pipeline is hard to say; aboriginal rights remain largely unsettled in British Columbia.

But that hasn't stopped Enbridge from courting the bands. "We want aboriginal economic participation in this project," said John Carruthers, president of Northern Gateway Pipelines. "We'd like them to own a stake that will establish a long-term benefit to First Nations communities." The company even offered financing to bring the bands aboard. So far there have been few takers.

"Buy in?" said Gitga'at council member Cameron Hill. "Buy in to what—to selling our way of life? We live off food from the land and sea here. We've been taught to respect what we take. That's sustained us from time immemorial. No amount of money can make us change our position."

The Canadian government's joint review panel is expected to mull over the issue for the next 18 months. Meanwhile, not far from Hill's home, the Queen of the North sends up an occasional burp of diesel fuel. In Hartley Bay the Queen may be dead, but she is not forgotten.

SOURCE: NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC:
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2011/08/canada-rainforest/barcott-text

Posted by activist under Environmental

10-year old Ta'Kaiya says 'Protect our coast from oil spills'

Jul 31, 2011



March 24, 2011
Open Letter to Canadian politicians,

My name is Ta'Kaiya Blaney. I am 10-years-old. I live in North Vancouver and am from the Sliammon Nation. My name means "special water."

I am writing to you because the Enbridge Corporation is planning to build a pipeline from the tar sands of Alberta to Kitimat, BC. I thought it would be very risky for our coast so I wrote a song, called "Shallow Waters" about an oil spill happening in the shallow waters.

You will be debating Bill C-606 soon, if an election is not triggered, which would ban oil tankers from our northwest coast. I am sharing my song's music video and a personal message to encourage you to vote in favour of the bill.

Today is the anniversary of the Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska. Even today, 22 years later, oil still remains a few inches under the surface of the water.

With this song, I hope to encourage government officials, people of British Columbia, and people across the world will realize the dangers of oil pollution, replace jobs that destroy the environment with jobs that help the environment. I ask government and corporate officials such as yourselves change your plans stop oil tanker traffic on BC's coast and in waters around the world.
Please feel free to share my letter and video with others.

All my relations,
Ta'Kaiya Blaney

Shallow Waters was a semi-finalist in the 2010 David Suzuki Songwriting Contest, Playlist for the Planet. The song was recorded in studio by Audio Producer Joe Cruz. Footage from Vancouver, BC was filmed by Colter Ripley. Footage of the traditional ocean-going canoe from the Squamish Nation (Burrard Inlet, North Vancouver, BC) ; Ta'Kaiya in traditional cedar bark regalia (Tofino, BC); the Oil Refinery in Burrard Inlet; and the Vancouver Aquarium was filmed by Tina House. Additional footage contributed from Canada Greenpeace and Living Oceans Society.

Posted by activist under Environmental

Patrick Awuah on educating leaders

Jul 31, 2011











Patrick Awuah makes the case that a liberal arts education is critical to forming true leaders.

Posted by activist under Media

Dave Meslin: The antidote to apathy

Jul 31, 2011











Local politics -- schools, zoning, council elections -- hit us where we live. So why don't more of us actually get involved? Is it apathy? Dave Meslin says no. He identifies 7 barriers that keep us from taking part in our communities, even when we truly care.

Posted by activist under Media